This past weekend I decided to Get Serious about the paper mess that has yet again accumulated on and around my desk. As I made my way through pile after pile, I realized the papers represented two main categories: things to toss-or-file, and things to act on or do.
In fact, this distinction is a key point in David Allen's book, Getting Things Done, a fact that went over my head when I first read the book in the fall. This time in dealing with my (considerably less supreme) paper mess, I could see the difference between the owner's manuals and tax receiptsand health records--archival information, in other words, that merely needed to be put away--and the flier from the ballet, an invitation to an event, a scribbled phone number, and the explanation of benefits from my insurance for a service I didn't recall having. These were things that required action--to decide whether or not to get tickets, to RSVP, to input the phone number in my address book, or call to investigate the claim.
Seeing both the archival information and what Allen calls "actionable items" jumbled together, I began to see the mistakes I've made in the past when it comes to processing paper. In doing so, I could better understand how to apply some of the tips and techniques Allen proposes.
Mistake #1: Jamming files willy-nilly with paperwork of all types, subjects, and purposes, in an effort to reign in paper mess.
This was bad, folks. It's the paper equivalent of the stash-and-dash: just grab anything and everything and stuff it in these cute folders. In my defense, I did not delude myself into thinking things were actually "filed" in this way. My delusion was that "at least this looks a little better--and I'll eventually get around to filing this!"
What's the problem with this approach? What's right about it? What needed to get tossed never got tossed, the archival information never got filed, and the to-do's never got done.
Mistake #2: (semi) filing items in a temporary "holding" box after making the original keep-or-purge decisions.
I know: some people can fit their entire filing system in such a box. And if I could fit all my files in this box, there'd be absolutely nothing wrong with storing my archival information in it. But I am not one of those people, folks. This could hold six months worth of files. Maybe.
What's the problem with this approach? In this case, the problem is two-fold: yet again, I have tasks intermingled with archival information. The other problem is the rather pointless and time-consuming half-measure of semi-filing items under the letter in the alphabet, before transferring them to their proper/permanent file.
Mistake #3: Treating the entire desk top like an enormous in-basket.
I have all this stuff to go through, where should I put it? Oh, there's a place here! In-between these two boxes! Perfect! I'll never find it now!
This approach begs two questions: What am I thinking? and: Will I ever learn?
Tasks undifferentiated from archival information--is there a pattern here? As we saw in Mistake #1, undifferentiated piles = to-do's not done, and files not filed.
Stay tuned tomorrow to see the three techniques that are helping to turn my paper mess around.
Recent Comments